Social media influencer Pressure granted mandatory bail in CDF case
Musana is facing two charges of unlawfully obtaining or processing personal data and hate speech.
Social media influencer Pressure granted mandatory bail in CDF case
_________________
The Buganda Road Chief Magistrate's Court has granted mandatory bail to social media influencer Ibrahim Musana alias Pressure 247, who is accused of posting hateful information about Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces (CDF), Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, after spending approximately five months on remand without his trial commencing.
Chief Magistrate Ritah Neumbe Kidasa granted Musana bail after prosecution said it did not object to his release, but asked the court to impose conditions sufficient to secure his return to court for trial.
Musana is facing two charges of unlawfully obtaining or processing personal data and hate speech.
According to the charge sheet, Musana is accused of unlawfully obtaining or processing personal data contrary to Section 35(1) and (2) of the Data Protection and Privacy Act, Cap 97.
Prosecution alleges that on March 5, 2026, at Asante Apartments, Kyanja, in Nakawa Division, Kampala, Musana unlawfully obtained or processed a photograph and name of Gen. Kainerugaba without his prior consent.
On the second count, Musana is charged with hate speech contrary to Section 26(1)(a) and (2) of the Computer Misuse Act, Cap 96.
Prosecution alleges that on the same date and place, Musana, using a computer and his TikTok account, @pressure247, shared information about or relating to Gen. Kainerugaba.
Court documents indicate that the information allegedly stated that Gen. Kainerugaba was not fit to hold the office of CDF and, according to prosecution, this was likely to ridicule, degrade or demean the CDF.
Court records show that Musana has been in lawful custody on remand since around March 10 - 11, 2026, when the charges were sanctioned and received by court.
The adjournments were attributed to the case file remaining at Police Headquarters and/or being under perusal by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
On July 22, 2026, Musana’s lawyer, Yasin Ssentumbwe, gave notice of an application for mandatory bail.
The lawyer presented one surety, Robert Kironde, but told court that a second surety was still being sourced.
On August 5, 2026, Ssentumbwe formally moved the application, submitting that his client had by then been on remand for well over 60 days without commencement of his trial.
He asked court to release Musana on mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution, paragraph 9 of the Judicature (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions and Section 76 of the Magistrates Courts Act.
State Attorney Grace Amy asked for a short adjournment to enable the prosecution team to retrieve authorities on the interpretation of mandatory bail.
The matter was subsequently adjourned for the ruling. When the case came up yesterday, Amy told court that the prosecution did not object to the grant of mandatory bail.
However, she asked court to impose terms that would ensure and guarantee Musana’s attendance in court for trial.
In her ruling, magistrate Kidasa said Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution entitles a person who has been remanded in custody for 60 days before trial in respect of a criminal offence to apply to be released on bail.
She said the court is required to release such a person on reasonable conditions considered necessary to secure his or her attendance for trial.
Kidasa said it was not disputed that Musana had, as of the date of the ruling, been on remand for approximately five months, well beyond the 60-day threshold.
She noted that his trial had not commenced and that the case file had remained under review at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions throughout that period.
The magistrate said the delay was through no fault of Musana. She further noted that the prosecution had been given an opportunity to research and address the issue of mandatory bail and had ultimately not opposed the application.
Kidasa ordered Musana to deposit sh1m cash for the bail, bind himself to appear before court on every date to which the case is adjourned until its final determination.
He was also ordered to deposit with court an introductory letter from the Local Council 1 chairperson of his place of abode and his National Identity Card.
The magistrate further ordered Musana to present two substantial sureties who meet the criteria set out in the bail guidelines.
The magistrate ordered that each surety must be a Ugandan citizen with a fixed and verifiable place of abode and/or employment within the jurisdiction of the court.
Kidasa also ordered that sureties must produce valid national identification documents and introductory letters from the Local Council 1 chairpersons of their respective areas of residence.
They must also satisfy court, through verification by the court registrar or clerk, that they are persons of good standing and have sufficient means to honour their obligations as sureties, Kidasa ordered.
She further ordered each surety to execute a non-cash surety bond of sh5m, undertaking to ensure Musana’s attendance in court and to forfeit the amount if he fails to appear without lawful cause.