How Uganda-Rwanda differences feed into current imperial plans

By Jackie Batamuliza

On pages 230-231 of ‘A Time to Lead: For Duty, Honor, and Country', Gen. Wesley Clark (Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander) writes, "I flew to Washington…There, a senior general relayed some disturbing news: "We're going to attack Iraq…". "But why?" I asked.

I had already caught indications that the Bush administration and some persons associated with the Israeli political right wing were seeking to pin the blame for the 9/11 attacks on Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. Based on everything I knew—and I'd followed the intelligence very closely….this didn't seem likely". "Saddam was a secular leader, and to the Islamic Al Qaeda, he was a sworn enemy. "Did they discover a linkage?" I asked. "No nothing like that…".

"When I returned to the Pentagon six weeks later, as we were striking Afghanistan and chasing off the Taliban, I asked the same general if there was still a plan to go after Iraq. "Oh, it's worse than that,"… "Here's the paper from the Office of the Secretary of Defense outlining the strategy. We're going to take out seven countries in five years! And he named them, starting with Iraq and Syria and ending with Iran".

In 2007, in a campaign to stop the war with Iran, Clark listed the other four countries which were Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan.

Looking back, the time matrix of the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act and the 2001 Dick Cheney Energy Report make absolute sense. The Act authorised President Clinton to designate recipients of assistance from the USA. The criteria were; opposition to Saddam's government, commitment to democratic values, among others. He was authorised to provide media and broadcasting assistance, military assistance for training and equipment and humanitarian assistance for individuals fleeing Saddam.

9/11 eventually legitimised the attack on Iraq and the wealth harvest from her Oil justified the red herring narrative of US hunt for energy. This was derived from the Cheney Report which has battled legal wars over the level of secrecy with which it was done. The narrative further thrived after the fall of Gaddafi's Libya, neighbours of Algeria and Niger with high-quality oil and uranium respectively.

Gaddafi's fall forced the Tuareg's (separatists formerly protected by Gadaffi) return to Mali with weapons acquired through the Libyan chaos, to form the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA). They joined with Al-Quaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MOJWA) and The Ansa Dine former rebel groups and attacked Mali in 2012. France contained the advancement towards Bamako but deliberately avoided destroying them which confirms Assange's Wiki-leaks reports on western support for terrorist groups and the interest in the conflict in the region.

Much as there were no Congressional acts to ‘liberate' Syria, Libya and Sudan among other fallen nations, the script used for Iraq has just been constantly revisited and edited to suit the populations. Time has proved Gen. Clark true, vindicated Saddam's Iraq and had us question how accurate it is to call the Arab spring a people driven movement remembering the world's accounts of coup de tats during the cold war.

In 2007, USA had wanted to establish United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) base in Mali and Presidents Mandela, Gaddafi and Nigeria opposed the idea which shaped a narrative that it caused Gaddafi's fall. However, to think that Gaddafi fell because he was objected to a military base in Mali would be to ignore the multiple other events in the region.

Firstly, looking at Clarke's list of nations of which only Iran is left (and whose fall would mean America's geopolitical containment of China) one observes an intended ‘domino theory' effect like that of Eisenhower in the cold war.

Secondly, the nations that have since fallen and those that have come close, including Mauritania, Western Sahara, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Jordan, Yemen, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Kuwaiti, Somalia, Lebanon and now pending Iran form the perfect mirror reflection of the map of the Hamitic and Semitic settlements drawn in German's 1932 Meyers Blitz Lexikon.

Since 2001, the world has been at war to destroy the political fiber of the Hamitic genealogy due to the importance of sexualisation as a political tool to destroy the "I" of human existence. This is written in the prologue of Samuel Aun's "Pistis Sophia Unveiled" (the blue print of the present sex movement). It should not be surprising that Semites in that region too must be targets, because they share a way of life (which is what is under attack) more so the Islamic faith which has exercised strictness on sexuality. Presently, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is not only Islamic but the host Hamitic ancestral homes of Phut (Libya)and Mizraim(Egypt) sons of Ham.

These efforts have been designed to wreck their religion/spirituality and dissolve or recreate their identity, a phenomenon already taking shape given the findings in the recent survey done by BBC News Arabic and the Arab Barometer. Sun Tzu said of war, "The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent".

Of the East African Hamites, Tom Stacey wrote in The Tribe, "These newcomers were Hamitic herdsmen…Noah's descendants, through…Ham's son Cush, according to…the Semites…they are here today as the Hima, carrying their name the Semitic consonantal hint- they Hay/Ha and the Mem/Mim of the Hebraic and Arabic Alphabet. East Africa's most capable and successful President of recent times, albeit designated Hima (by quirk of tribal nomenclature), is a Nilotic. He is an ethnic and quondam political brother of the Tutsis who prevail (and will continue to prevail) both in Rwanda… Burundi…. Eastern Congo. I speak of Museveni."

It goes without say, Mali's conflict was followed by South Sudan (2013), Chad (2014), Central African Republic had been at it in 2012 now Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) all in close proximity to Uganda and Rwanda who are the security block of the Great Lakes Region.

The writer is a programmes associate of the Great Lakes Institute for Strategic Studies