KAMPALA — Uganda’s government and the World Health Organization are pushing to strengthen social services at the parish level, in what officials describe as a critical effort to make government programmes more visible, responsive and effective in ordinary communities.
On May 15, WHO Uganda convened senior government officials, local government leaders and development partners in discussions aimed at accelerating the operationalisation of Parish Social Services Committees, structures expected to improve coordination of public services closer to citizens.
The meeting brought together permanent secretaries from the ministries of Health, Local Government, Gender, Labour and Social Development, and Education and Sports, alongside officials from the Health Service Commission, the Social Services Committee and leaders from seven pilot local governments.
Although the discussions focused on administrative coordination, the bigger issue at stake is one that affects millions of Ugandans directly: whether government services actually reach communities efficiently and whether local citizens can hold public systems accountable when they fail.
For years, Uganda has expanded national programmes in health, education and social protection, yet many communities still struggle with weak coordination, delayed implementation and gaps between national policy and what people experience on the ground.
The Parish Social Services Committees are intended to address part of that disconnect.
The committees are linked to the Parish Development Model, commonly known as the PDM, government’s flagship programme designed to improve household incomes and strengthen service delivery through parish-level structures.
Officials say the latest discussions particularly focused on the programme’s fourth pillar, which deals with social services.
Speaking during the meeting, Ministry of Health Permanent Secretary Dr. Diana Atwine said the conversations were important for strengthening implementation of the Parish Development Model at community level.
In practical terms, the committees are expected to improve coordination between local leaders, health workers, education officials and community structures so that public services are monitored more effectively, and community concerns reach decision-makers faster.
Officials also emphasised the importance of citizen feedback.
Kedrace Turyagyenda