___________________
Former Kajara County parliamentary candidate Venansio Ahabwe has petitioned the Court of Appeal challenging a High Court decision that upheld the election of James Hunter Byenjeru Tukahirwa as Member of Parliament for Kajara County in Ntungamo district.
Ahabwe wants the appellate court to overturn a judgment delivered by Mbarara High Court Judge Tom Chemutai on October 12, 2026, which dismissed the election petition challenging Tukahirwa’s eligibility to contest in the January 15, 2026, general elections.
In his memorandum of appeal, Ahabwe argues that the trial judge erred in law and fact when he found that Tukahirwa was not disqualified from contesting for the parliamentary seat despite having been demoted from his position in the public service by the Leadership Code Tribunal.
The dispute centres on Section 49(7) of the Leadership Code Act, which bars a leader or public officer dismissed or removed from office following a decision of the Leadership Code Tribunal from holding any public office, whether appointive or elective, for five years from the date of dismissal or removal.
Ahabwe contends that Tukahirwa’s demotion by the tribunal in April 2022 amounted to removal from office and consequently disqualified him from contesting for an elective position within the five-year restriction period.
According to the petitioners’ case, Tukahirwa was previously employed as a Senior Assistant Secretary in the Ministry of Health before facing disciplinary proceedings before the Leadership Code Tribunal in 2022 over the misuse of two government vehicles.
On April 26, 2022, the tribunal ordered his demotion under Section 12B(4) of the Leadership Code Act.
However, on May 26, 2022, Tukahirwa applied for early retirement from public service before the expiry of the 30-day period communicated by the tribunal’s registrar for implementation of the decision.
The Ministry of Public Service subsequently cleared him for early retirement, indicating that implementation of the tribunal’s decision had been overtaken by events.
The petitioners challenged the retirement process, arguing that it was irregular and that Tukahirwa had left the public service before the tribunal’s disciplinary decision could be implemented.
In his judgment delivered on October 12, 2026, Justice Chemutai agreed with the respondent’s position, finding that the petitioners ought to have appealed the EC’s determination.
On the question of whether Tukahirwa’s demotion disqualified him from contesting, the judge distinguished between demotion and dismissal, noting that the two disciplinary outcomes had different legal implications.
Citing Black’s Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition, Justice Chemutai explained that demotion involves reducing an employee’s rank, job title, responsibilities or remuneration within an organisation, while dismissal refers to officially removing someone from employment.
The judge noted that although the Leadership Code Tribunal had ordered Tukahirwa’s demotion, he had not been dismissed from public service.
Instead, he remained an employee until he applied for early retirement, which was subsequently approved by the Ministry of Public Service.
Justice Chemutai acknowledged that the ministry’s decision to clear Tukahirwa for early retirement was tainted with irregularity because it was made despite the existence of the tribunal’s disciplinary decision.
However, he ruled that the irregularity was insufficient to establish that Tukahirwa had been dismissed or removed from office within the meaning of Section 49(7) of the Leadership Code Act.