_________________
OPINION
By Adv. Mariam Wangadya
The chairperson, Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), Mariam Wangadya delivered a keynote address at the opening of the UNOCT workshop on human rights and gender equality in counter-terrorism at the Uganda Police Force CT Resource Centre, Kampala. The workshop was held under the theme Human Rights and Gender Equality in Counter-Terrorism: Good Practices, Key Challenges and the Way Forward. Below is her presentation.
I stand before you not just as chairperson of the Uganda Human Rights Commission, but as a citizen who deeply believes that justice and security must walk hand in hand. This is more than a workshop. It is a reckoning. A dialogue we have long needed. And a commitment we must now honour — with action.
We are gathered here to discuss terrorism.
To confront it. To outthink it. But above all, to do so without compromising the very values terrorism seeks to destroy. Because if we trade away human rights in the name of security, we hand victory to terror without a fight.
No nation will ever arrest or detain its way to peace. We must be brave enough to say what many avoid: Security that tramples rights is not security. It is repression. And repression feeds the very violence we seek to prevent. This is why this workshop matters.
You are not just reviewing legal frameworks or operational practices. You are shaping the ethical spine of Uganda’s counter-terrorism response.
The three issues before us are not merely procedural questions. They are litmus tests. They reveal how far we’re willing to bend the rule of law in the face of fear.
Let’s take them, one by one.
This is not a technicality. It is a constitutional safeguard. A test of state accountability. A reminder that even in moments of fear, the law still reigns.
In today’s world, digital devices carry our lives. To seize them is to hold someone’s identity in your hands. This power must be exercised with the utmost restraint. And under the strictest legal and ethical standards.
We must ask hard questions: Who accesses the data? How long is it kept? What checks exist to prevent abuse?
Terrorism should never be a pretext for mass surveillance. Our digital rights are human rights. And every intrusion must meet the test of necessity, proportionality and legality.
Again, I urge us to be realistic. Seventy-two hours may seem sufficient in theory, but in practice — especially in complex forensic investigations — it can become a race against logistical and technological hurdles. Let us not forget: when rights are on the line, shortcuts are not solutions. Instead, we need timelines that are not only principled but practical.
Ambition must walk hand-in-hand with capacity.
This may be the most morally complex challenge of all. Because behind some terror suspects, we find children abducted, women coerced, and youth indoctrinated.
Victims forced into violence, then punished for the chains they never chose. The criminal justice system must be wise enough to distinguish threat from trauma. It must know when to prosecute — and when to protect. And in doing so, we must expand our vision of who counts as vulnerable.
Sometimes, the individuals most at risk of exclusion, of abuse, of marginalisation — are not the most visible. They may not speak loudly. They may not be widely understood. But they, too, deserve the full protection of the law.
Our commitment to rights must extend even to those whose identities or experiences challenge us. Because dignity is not selective. It is universal — or it is nothing at all. If we fail to see the victim behind the crime, we fail justice itself.
These issues strike at the heart of what it means to uphold human rights under pressure. They demand courage. Not just from security officers, but from all of us. From prosecutors, judges, political leaders, the media, and yes, from institutions like the Uganda Human Rights Commission. It is not enough to observe abuses after they happen. We must be proactive guardians of human dignity. We must embed human rights in every briefing. In every arrest. In every courtroom. In every investigation. Not as an afterthought. But as a principle. Because it is only when our methods are just that our mission becomes legitimate.
To the Uganda Police Force and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, your roles, just like mine, are difficult. You carry the burden of security. And you do so in the face of very real threats. But you are not alone. The law is your ally. The Constitution is your compass. And the people’s trust is your strength. Use it well.