Blogs
How AFCON 2027 can pay African breeders
AFCON PAMOJA 2027 is more than a football tournament. For African breeders, it is a commercial platform that will not repeat itself in the same form. Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda will jointly host the TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations in 2027 — the first three-country finals and the first return of the competition to East Africa since 1976, writes Andrew Kabuubi
Andrew Kabuubi. (File)
By: Admin ., Journalist @New Vision
________________
OPINION
By Andrew Kabuubi
AFCON PAMOJA 2027 is more than a football tournament. For African breeders, it is a commercial platform that will not repeat itself in the same form. Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda will jointly host the TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations in 2027 — the first three-country finals and the first return of the competition to East Africa since 1976.
CAF expects more than 1.5 million fans. Its commercial leadership has spoken of a television audience of about 3 billion and of an economic impact above $2b across the three hosts, in line with the estimate of what Morocco took from the 2025 edition. Later finals are already in view for 2028, 2032 and 2036.
Demand for playing surfaces will outlast a month of matches. The pitch is an agricultural product with a priced market behind it. The global sports-turf seed market is about $3b and is forecast to reach $4.9b by 2035. Sports-turf maintenance is larger still, about $7.6b in 2024 and forecast at $12.9b by 2033.
A professional natural-grass pitch typically costs $65,000–95,000 a year to maintain, so the revenue is recurring, not a one-off seed sale. Africa is barely in that market. One industry cut puts Middle East and Africa sports-turf product sales at about $7m — a gap, not a ceiling.
A World Football Summit assessment puts the continent’s football-infrastructure requirement at about $80b by 2030. Elite football needs turf that recovers fast, tolerates wear and handles East African heat, rainfall and water-logging with less irrigation.
The same variety sells again outside the stadium. Africa already has on the order of 800 to 900 golf courses — about 45 in Kenya, 18 in Uganda and 13 in Tanzania — and golf is forecast to take about 30% of sports-turf seed demand. South Africa’s golf economy alone is estimated at about $3b a year.
Demand for playing surfaces will outlast a month of matches. The pitch is an agricultural product with a priced market behind it. The global sports-turf seed market is about $3b and is forecast to reach $4.9b by 2035. Sports-turf maintenance is larger still, about $7.6b in 2024 and forecast at $12.9b by 2033.
A professional natural-grass pitch typically costs $65,000–95,000 a year to maintain, so the revenue is recurring, not a one-off seed sale. Africa is barely in that market. One industry cut puts Middle East and Africa sports-turf product sales at about $7m — a gap, not a ceiling.
A World Football Summit assessment puts the continent’s football-infrastructure requirement at about $80b by 2030. Elite football needs turf that recovers fast, tolerates wear and handles East African heat, rainfall and water-logging with less irrigation.
The same variety sells again outside the stadium. Africa already has on the order of 800 to 900 golf courses — about 45 in Kenya, 18 in Uganda and 13 in Tanzania — and golf is forecast to take about 30% of sports-turf seed demand. South Africa’s golf economy alone is estimated at about $3b a year.
Clubs, schools, universities, hotels and private grounds need the same surface. A pitch that holds up under the AFCON lights becomes the reference that licenses into those markets.
The return sits in ownership. A protected variety supports license fees, royalties, multiplication agreements and multi-year supply contracts. Without early protection, the work is copied and the margin goes to the importer. The path is breed, test, protect, license and scale.
Waiting until venues are specified means the contract risks going to foreign seed and foreign expertise.
This opening can be turned into a bankable asset. The question is no longer who needs better varieties — in plants or animals. It is who will own them, who will collect the royalties, and who will still be supplying the market after the final. Breeders who protect their innovations early will be better placed to answer those questions.
The writer is a senior associate Practice Group (TMT & IP)
The return sits in ownership. A protected variety supports license fees, royalties, multiplication agreements and multi-year supply contracts. Without early protection, the work is copied and the margin goes to the importer. The path is breed, test, protect, license and scale.
Waiting until venues are specified means the contract risks going to foreign seed and foreign expertise.
This opening can be turned into a bankable asset. The question is no longer who needs better varieties — in plants or animals. It is who will own them, who will collect the royalties, and who will still be supplying the market after the final. Breeders who protect their innovations early will be better placed to answer those questions.
The writer is a senior associate Practice Group (TMT & IP)