TOP
Monday,September 28,2020 21:26 PM
  • Home
  • News
  • Court of Appeal throws out BoU case against Sudhir

Court of Appeal throws out BoU case against Sudhir

By Charles Etukuri

Added 23rd June 2020 03:18 PM

Bank of Uganda (BoU) /Crane Bank in receivership had sued Ruparelia and Meera Investments Limited accusing them of allegedly fleecing the defunct Crane Bank Limited (CBL) of Shs397 billion that the central bank wants to be refunded.

Court of Appeal throws out BoU case against Sudhir

Sudhir Ruparelia (left) interacts with Katatumba (right) as his lawyers look on after winning the Bank of Uganda appeal case at Court of Appeal, Nakasero on 23rd June 2020. (Photo by Juliet Kasirye)

Bank of Uganda (BoU) /Crane Bank in receivership had sued Ruparelia and Meera Investments Limited accusing them of allegedly fleecing the defunct Crane Bank Limited (CBL) of Shs397 billion that the central bank wants to be refunded.

COURT   

KAMPALA - Billions of tax payer's money will be used to pay city businessman Sudhir Ruparelia after Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed a multi-billion case in which Bank of Uganda had sued the businessman and his Meera investments accusing them of siphoning over sh397bn from the defunct Crane Bank.

In a ruling read in court by registrar Mary Babirye, Deputy Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny -Dollo, Justice Cheborion Barishaki and Justice Steven Musota unanimously noted that after a careful perusal of the evidence, submitted they found no misconduct against Sudhir that would warrant litigation and henceforth, ordered Bank of Uganda to pay costs incurred by the businessman to defend himself.

Rajiv Ruparelia (left) interacts with Sudhir Ruparelia(Centre) as Peter Kabatsi, lead counsel looks on during the celebrations of winning the Bank of Uganda appeal case at Court of Appeal, Nakasero on 23rd June 2020. (Photo by Juliet Kasirye)


Byamugisha & Co. Advocates represented Bank of Uganda while Kampala Associated Advocates (KAA) represented Ruparelia and Meera.

The Court of Appeal also noted that at the time of the filing of the suit in January 2017, Crane Bank Limited was already in receivership and a non-existing entity whose lifetime was terminated when Bank of Uganda sold its assets to DFCU in October 2016.

Bank of Uganda (BoU) /Crane Bank in receivership had sued Ruparelia and Meera Investments Limited accusing them of allegedly fleecing the defunct Crane Bank Limited (CBL) of sh397 billion that the central bank wants to be refunded.

Joseph Matsiko (left), managing director Kampala Associated Advocates interacts with Sudhir Ruparelia(right) after winning the Bank of Uganda appeal case. (Photo by Juliet Kasirye)


The three judges also agreed with the High Court Judge David Wangutusi earlier ruling that being in receivership, Crane Bank had no capacity to institute legal proceedings against its former Director.

"In the instant case, we find no such misconduct relating to litigation on the part of the respondents and as such, we find no reason to deny the respondents' costs of the suit. We, therefore, uphold the trial judge's order as to costs. The appeal consequently fails. It is thus dismissed with costs here and the court below," the judges ruled

In August last year Bank of Uganda appealed Justice David Wangutusi ruling in which he had dismissed on a technicality, the sh397b lodged by Crane Bank in receivership against Sudhir Ruparelia, and his Meera Investment Company.

Rajiv Ruparelia (left) interacts with Sudhir Ruparelia (right) during the Bank of Uganda appeal case judgment at Court of Appeal, Nakasero on 23rd June 2020. (Photo by Juliet Kasirye)


Justice Wangutusi in his ruling noted that Crane Bank had been placed under receivership and was insulated against legal proceedings according to Section 96 of the Financial Institutions Act (FIA) and, therefore, had no powers to sue Ruparelia.

Addressing the media at the Court, Ruparelia who was flanked by his son Rajiv Ruparelia and lawyers of Kampala Associated Advocates requested for sanity to return to Bank of Uganda. He noted that his lawyers would be submitting the costs they have incurred to BOU.

Related articles

More From The Author

More From The Author