Madagascar calls on EU to replace envoy who criticised castration law

Apr 05, 2024

In early February the Malagasy parliament passed a bill allowing chemical and surgical castration of people convicted of raping minors. Amnesty International condemned the measure as "cruel, inhuman and degrading".

EU

AFP .
@New Vision

______________

Antananarivo, Madagascar | AFP

Madagascar has called on the EU to replace its ambassador to the island nation who had criticised a recent law allowing castration of child rapists, officials said on Thursday.

In early February the Malagasy parliament passed a bill allowing chemical and surgical castration of people convicted of raping minors. Amnesty International condemned the measure as "cruel, inhuman and degrading".

A few weeks later, the European Union's ambassador, Isabelle Delattre Burger, who has been critical of the government in the past, blasted the measure during a press conference as "contrary even to the Madagascar constitution" and to international norms.

She was summoned to the foreign ministry following the remarks.

On Thursday, a spokeswoman for the European Commission told AFP that Madagascar has called on Brussels to replace the envoy.

"Madagascar's foreign affairs minister addressed a letter to the high commissioner to express his dissatisfaction... and to ask the EU proceed to replace the head of its delegation in Madagascar," Nabila Massrali, told AFP by telephone from Brussels.

The EU is studying the demand "in consultation with the Malagasy government", she said, adding that regular ambassador rotations are due to take place in September.

Clara Randrianjara, the head of communications for the Madagascar foreign affairs ministry, told AFP that "this letter should have remained confidential" and declined to comment further.

The EU is one of the main donors to Madagascar, which heavily depends on international aid and where nearly 75 percent of the 29 million-strong population live in poverty.

At the end of February, Madagascar's High Constitutional Court validated the surgical castration portion of the controversial bill, but excluded chemical castration because of its "temporary and reversible character" that would not "permanently neutralise sexual predators".

Help us improve! We're always striving to create great content. Share your thoughts on this article and rate it below.

Comments

No Comment


More News

More News

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});