________________
WAKISO - Two prosecution witnesses clashed in court when they made contradictory statements in a sh500m Entebbe land case.
In her complaint, businesswoman Peace Barigye told court that she was present at the scene when Yunus Magom allegedly trespassed on the disputed land. But another prosecution witness, Martin Musinguzi, a boda-boda rider, rubbished the claim.
During the hearing presided over by the Entebbe Chief Magistrate, Stella Maris Amabilis, on Tuesday, Musinguzi told court that Barigye was not at the scene when Magom allegedly trespassed on the land.
The two were testifying in a case where Magom is accused of trespassing on a disputed land worth over sh500m on Uringi Crescent in Entebbe, Wakiso district.
Barigye said at about midday on September 7, 2022, Magom trespassed on her land.
“On that day, I saw Magom and three other men carrying stones using a wheelbarrow. I told him to leave, but he refused, saying he was fighting for his father’s land.”
Barigye said she then contacted the Police who went to the scene and arrested Magom.
But when Musinguzi took the witness stand, he told court that Barigye was not at the scene when the incident happened.
Musinguzi said on the said date, he was at Kabuye Complex Stage at 5:30pm when he saw three men, a woman and a girl inside the gate next to Barigye’s house.
The boda-boda stage is opposite the land in question.
Musinguzi said the group came pushing a wheelbarrow with stones in it.
Asked by Chief State Attorney Annet Janet Nabulobi whether Barigye was at her home at the time, Musinguzi said she was not there.
He said Barigye returned home 30 minutes after the accused (Magom) and his colleagues had left.
The next day, Musinguzi said Barigye called him from the stage to her home from where a policeman recorded a statement from him.
In her complaint, businesswoman Peace Barigye told court that she was present at the scene when Yunus Magom (Pictured) allegedly trespassed on the disputed land. (All Photos by Barbra Kabahumuza)
Cross examination
In cross-examination, defence lawyers Philip Aryatuha and Herbert Chesiyey asked the witness to explain at what time he saw five people ferrying stones from Omamteker's to Barigye's compound.
"Your statement indicates that at around 5:30pm, you saw three men but the complaint said she saw them at midday. We want to ascertain who was there and who was not," Aryatuha sought clarification.
However, the witness did not answer the question after the magistrate insisted that the question should have been posed to the complainant (Barigye).
Aryatuha informed the court that they had a challenge with the authenticity of the document presented in court (an Internal memo) and wondered how it landed in the hands of the complainant (Barigye) yet she is not an employee of the Ministry of Lands.
This prompted the magistrate to summon the author of the document from the Ministry of Lands to appear in court on November 9, 2023.
Previously the court directed Barigye to present her original land title but she presented a letter from DFCU bank indicating that it's holding it as security. The case resumes on November 9, 2023.
High Court
In a different suit, Entebbe Junior School proprietor Rosemary Omamteker sued Barigye in the Land Division of the High Court in Kampala, for trespassing on the disputed land.
Omamteker told court that she is the registered owner of the land, having possessed a certificate of title for the same in 2010.
The land located on Plot 31 on Uringi Crescent in Entebbe measures approximately 0.101 hectares (0.249 acres).
Omamteker said in January 2021, she embarked on surveying her land and in the process, she discovered that Barigye was sitting on Plot 31B and had started building a structure on her property.
However, the survey discovered that Barigye had allegedly encroached 1.5 meters by structure and had fenced off approximately 300 square meters onto her (Omamteker’s) land.
Omamteker contends that she shares an access road to their respective plots of land with Barigye, but she has with arrogance erected a gate on the access road, hence preventing her from accessing her plot.