Urgent reforms needed for NDP IV success —advocacy group

13th January 2025

Mukunda urged Parliament to amend the law to formalise programme-based budgeting and restructure its committees to track outcomes of programmes that span multiple sectors.

Mukunda highlighted the country’s outdated legal framework which he said does not fully support the programmatic approach to budgeting introduced in NDP IV. (New Vision/Files)
NewVision Reporter
@NewVision
#Parliament #CSBAG #NDP IV #Julius Mukunda


KAMPALA - The Civil Society Budget Advocacy Group (CSBAG) has expressed concern about the Government's ability to deliver on the ambitious targets outlined in Uganda’s fourth National Development Plan (NDP IV).

CSBAG executive director Julius Mukunda says budgetary shortfalls, misaligned priorities and inefficiencies in implementation are setting the plan up for failure unless urgent reforms are undertaken.

Mukunda, who made the remarks while appearing before Parliament's budget committee chaired by Patrick Isiagi on January 8, 2025, said there is a worrying gap between the proposed budget and the resources required to meet its goals. 

The House committee is scrutinising the proposals in the draft NDPIV, outlining a roadmap for Uganda’s development over the next five years.

For the financial year 2025/26, the Government has allocated shillings 57.4 trillion which is short of the planned 67.8 trillion.

“Starting NDP IV with such a significant shortfall of shillings 10.4 trillion signals early failure in achieving the desired results,” he said.

He criticised the underfunding of critical programmes like the Area-Based Transformative Measures (ATMs) which are central to driving growth under NDP IV.

“These ATMs are considered the magic growth pillars of the plan, yet they have been allocated only Shs2.7 trillion out of the required Shs4.7 trillion. A gap of Shs2 trillion is unacceptable and undermines the entire initiative,” Mukunda added.

According to a Parliament press release, Mukunda also highlighted discrepancies in resource allocation, where some programmes such as Development Plan Implementation and Sustainable Urbanisation and Housing have received funding exceeding NDP IV estimates.

“This is not a sign of additional investment but a reflection of poor co-ordination and unco-ordinated allocation of resources,” he said.

According to him, without proper alignment, 'we risk fragmented efforts and a divergence from the core objectives of the development plan’.

Improved co-ordination is key

Mukunda stressed that achieving the goals of NDP IV requires improved co-ordination among government agencies to ensure that interventions are well-planned and realistically cost.

“We need evidence-based costing that reflects the availability of resources and the potential outcomes of each programme. Only then can we ensure that every shilling spent contributes directly to Uganda’s transformation agenda,” he said.

He also called for stronger accountability mechanisms to monitor how resources are used.

“We must enforce accountability at all levels from national agencies to local governments to ensure that funds are spent as planned and to avoid waste and corruption,” Mukunda stated.

Mukunda highlighted the country’s outdated legal framework which he said does not fully support the programmatic approach to budgeting introduced in NDP IV.

“The Public Finance Management Act of 2015 and its accompanying regulations still reference sectoral committees and sector budget framework papers which are incompatible with the new approach,” he said.

Mukunda urged Parliament to amend the law to formalise programme-based budgeting and restructure its committees to track outcomes of programmes that span multiple sectors.

Faith Nakut (NRM, Napak District Woman) hailed the proposals by CSBAG, especially on penalties for districts that fail to comply with the NDP stating that it will make them take the goals seriously.

Agnes Apea (Amolatar District Woman) said the NDP looks like a project development plan rather than a development plan.

“In the infrastructure development, a plan could have come for instance for Northern Uganda stating that for infrastructure and connectivity, we will have a rail here, these roads connect here…something like that, but the plan has cherry-picking,” she said.

Help us improve! We're always striving to create great content. Share your thoughts on this article and rate it below.