Uganda’s EPS: A step towards safer roads or source of controversy?

___________________

OPINION

By Bishop Samuel

In an ambitious move to enhance road safety, Uganda has launched the Express Payment System (EPS Auto), a high-tech initiative designed to automate the detection and penalisation of traffic violations. This system, developed in collaboration with the Intelligent Transport Monitoring System (ITMS), aims to reduce reckless driving by issuing fines directly to offenders' mobile phones. However, the rollout has sparked a debate on its fairness and the financial implications for Ugandans.

The EPS Auto system utilises advanced technology to monitor traffic violations such as speeding and running red lights, with cameras and sensors placed strategically to capture infractions 24/7 and automatically issue fines. While proponents argue that the initiative promotes responsible driving and road safety, there are critical concerns about its implementation.

Did policymakers take sufficient time to assess whether this system is suitable for Ugandan motorists before approval? Was there adequate public sensitisation to ensure drivers understand how it operates? Given its nationwide rollout, questions remain about its fairness, accessibility, and impact on low-income motorists, especially regarding enforcement and penalty structures.

Without proper engagement and awareness, is this system serving its intended purpose effectively, or is it another policy rushed into action without fully considering its implications for Ugandan road users?

Despite its intended benefits, the system has faced criticism. Some Ugandans argue that the fines are disproportionately high, placing an undue financial burden on citizens. Critics also question the transparency of the revenue generated from these fines, particularly the government's percentage take. There are concerns about whether the funds are being reinvested into road safety improvements or absorbed into other governmental expenditures.

Experts in transportation and public policy have weighed in on the debate. Dr John Kiggundu, a transportation analyst, suggests that while the system has the potential to improve road safety, its implementation must be accompanied by public education campaigns. "Drivers need to understand not only the penalties but also the rationale behind them," he states. "Without this understanding, the system may be perceived as punitive rather than preventative."

Moreover, there are calls for a more equitable approach to traffic enforcement. Critics argue that the system should consider socio-economic factors and offer alternative penalties, such as community service, for those unable to pay fines. This perspective highlights the need for a balanced approach that prioritises road safety without disproportionately impacting lower-income individuals.

Timeline-wise, the EPS Auto system has been in development for several years, with pilot testing conducted in select regions before its nationwide launch. The government has pledged to monitor its effectiveness and make necessary adjustments based on feedback from the public and stakeholders.

In conclusion, Uganda's EPS Auto system represents a significant technological advancement in traffic enforcement. However, its success hinges on addressing public concerns about fairness and financial transparency. As the system evolves, it will be crucial for the Ugandan government to engage with citizens, ensuring that the initiative not only enhances road safety but also garners public trust and support.