Opinion
Clarity on requirements of a landlord before evicting a tenant
Publish Date: Aug 15, 2014
newvision
  • mail
  • img

By Tom Balemesa

On Sunday August 10, 2014, the SundayVision published an article ‘what is required of a landlord before evicting a tenant? This was good information but some facts were not put right.


The writer wrongly gives an impression that there was an amendment to the Land Act (Cap 227) which is not true and a bit misleading. The last amendment to the Act was in 2010. That said, there are some substantive legal issues which the writer seems to have mixed up and risk causing confusion.

The landlord-tenant relationship as enacted under the Land Act, Cap 227 has become controversial around three issues: the definition of bonafide occupant, definition of occupancy in terms of size of land utilized by occupants, the rights conferred on the tenants and the rent payable.

In my opinion it is important to separate bona fide and lawful occupants from other forms of tenants. The protection from eviction, i.e. the condition that a person cannot be evicted from land unless he/she has failed to pay rent is only available to lawful and bona fide occupants and not any other form of tenants. Going by the definition of lawful occupant in the land Act, a person needs to have come to occupy the land under the following circumstances;


(a) a person occupying land by virtue of the repealed  Busuulu and Envujjo Law of 1928;  Tooro Landlord and Tenant Law of 1937; Ankole Landlord and Tenant Law of 1937;
(b) a person who entered the land with the consent of the registered owner, and includes a purchaser; or
(c) a person who had occupied land as a customary tenant but whose tenancy was not disclosed or compensated for by the registered owner at the time of acquiring the leasehold certificate of title.

A bona fide occupant on the other hand is a person who before the coming into force of the Constitution
(a) had occupied and utilised or developed any land unchallenged by the registered owner or agent of the registered owner for twelve years or more; or
(b) had been settled on land by the Government or an agent of the Government, which may include a local authority.


Going by the above generally the tenants who are protected from eviction unless they have failed to pay rent are persons who occupied land by 1983 (12 years before 1995 when the constitution came into force).


This provision is often confused by person who may have recently settled on land and are under a false belief that they cannot be evicted. This confusion has partly contributed to the conflict between landlords and tenants we are seeing in the country today.

As the writer correctly put it, any form of eviction must be done under a court order. This avoids abuse of process and conflicts. The writer highlights the presidential directive on eviction which in my view has very good provisions, however such provisions are not prescribed by law and a person seeking to rely on them may face challenges in having them applied. It is for this reason that good directives like those issued by the president in 2013 should be backed by the law.


There is need to hasten the reform of the land laws to address the increasing land conflicts. Such reforms should not only consider the rights of tenants as against rights of landlords but should be broad to cover all other aspects of family, cultural and social attachments that people have on land.

Tom Balemesa works with Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment.
 

Related Stories

Six questions on evicting tenants

Land Amendment BiIl to protect tenants from evictions

Resist eviction, Museveni tells tenants in Mpigi

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
The implication of the exchange rate depreciation for inflation and monetary policy
I would like to begin by commending the Private Sector Foundation for organising this Trade Expo, which performs an important role in promoting trade and industry in Uganda....
Why we should support women’s growth in politics
Women’s political participation is no longer an issue of contention as the Constitution gives every woman the right to vote, campaign for elective political office, attend village/ local council meetings and belong to a political party of their choice....
Scott DeLisi’ on bilateral relations between Uganda and US
After 34 long years during which his service in the US diplomatic missions has seen him serve in Nepal, Pakistan, Madagascar and Botswana, the outgoing American envoy to Uganda, Scott DeLisi, has decided to saunter into retirement....
Korean crisis control
Having just been on holiday with two very strong-willed little boys aged eight and nine, I feel particularly well qualified to explain why the two Koreas have gone to the brink of war over some loudspeakers, but probably won’t go over the edge....
What Uganda needs to achieve a demographic dividend
The Demographic refers to a window of opportunity for accelerated economic growth that might result from a change in the population age structure, where there are more people in the labour force than dependents....
A new chance for Cyprus
The Greek crisis may seem unending, but there are hints that a problem festering in Europe for far longer – the division of Cyprus – may be moving toward resolution....
Do you support KCCA'S move to ban campaign posters from the city?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter