National
South Sudan: ‘IGAD did not ask UPDF to withdraw’
Publish Date: Feb 03, 2014
South Sudan: ‘IGAD did not ask UPDF to withdraw’
Minister of Foreign Affairs Sam Kutesa (left) flanked by the State Minister for International Cooperation Okello Oryem addressing reporters in Kampala. PHOTO/By Wilfred Sanya.
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By David Lumu

The Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) did not ask Uganda to withdraw her troops from South Sudan, Foreign Affairs Minister, Sam Kutesa, has clarified.


Kutesa said that it is true that during the just concluded African Union summit, IGAD member states (Uganda, Sudan, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti) had a meeting on the sidelines about South Sudan and what members discussed was far from the allegations in the press that the UPDF was asked to leave South Sudan.

Kutesa told a news conference at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Kampala that IGAD members agreed that they cannot condone the unconstitutional removal of an elected government.

According to Kutesa, the member states agreed to combat impunity and hold accountable those responsible for committing atrocities, implement the cessation of hostilities, work on mechanism to release the remaining four detainees (Majak D'Agoot, Pagan Amum, Ezekiel Lol Gatkuoth, and Oyai Deng Ajak) and working out a disengagement mechanism for parallel forces in South Sudan and their allies.

“Now some section of the press had misinterpreted this (disengagement of forces) to mean that Ugandan forces should withdraw.  That is far from the truth, it was not discussed in that IGAD meeting,” he said.

 At the African Union summit, Kutesa said that the African Union Peace and Security Council members unanimously backed the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) position on South Sudan.

Explaining what the IGAD position means, Kutesa said that Ethiopia and Kenya are pushing for peace talks while Uganda intervened in South Sudan to ensure that the rebellion ends and peace talks happen.

The minister also stressed that the UPDF intervention in Juba was embraced by IGAD on December 27 last year.

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Uganda to pursue MDG targets beyond 2015 – Kutesa
Uganda will continue to build on attaining the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) targets even after the deadline of next year 2015, Sam Kutesa, the President-elect of the UN General Assembly has said...
Anglican Church governing body meets today
The Provincial Assembly meeting of Anglican Church in Uganda meets today at Nkoyoyo Hall in Uganda Christian University Mukon...
Mulago hospital boss detained over office abuse
There was drama Tuesday when the parliamentary criminal investigations department arrested Mulago hospital administrator Alison Kantarama over illegal connections to the hospital water and electricity lines...
Police warn city drivers over demo
Police have warned all city taxi drivers planning to strike over Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) operations in the city that they will be dealt with...
Traffic police to limit bus drivers
The acting director of traffic and road safety directorate of Police, Steven Kasiima, has directed that bus drivers will not be allowed to drive over 300km a day...
70 S. Sudan refugees entering Uganda daily
An estimated 70 refugees from South Sudan continue entering Ugandan on a daily basis in Adjuman, statistics indicate...
Will strict traffic laws reduce road accidents?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter