National
Congolese man in seized ivory sagaPublish Date: Jan 11, 2014
Congolese man in seized ivory saga
  • mail
  • img
Uganda Revenue Authority say the ivory was smuggled into the country.
newvision

By Job Bwire

KAMPALA - The Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) has threatened to have a Congolese businessman arrested in connection to ivory it believes was smuggled into the country.

The man went to court claiming ownership of the recently impounded 832 pieces of ivory from Bweyogere, Kampala.

Speaking with New Vision on Friday at Nakawa High Court after the hearing of the case hit a snag, the URA legal representative, Bernard Olok, said they intend to apply for an international warrant of arrest for Emille Kayumba Ogane.

The Congolese national, who failed to appear in court despite a court order, is the director of Kayumba Company Ltd.

URA impounded the said ivory on October 17 last year from Ken Freight Forwarders.

Following the confiscation of the material, Kayumba sued URA and sought a court order to compel the tax body to release the ivory.

In the application filed before Nakawa High Court judge, Wilson Musalu, the businessman said he exported the ivory from DR Congo’s Goma through Bunagana border post into Uganda lawfully.

Kayumba’s court application indicates that his agent secured transit transport from Ken Freight Forwarders and a container but that the cargo was seized by URA on claims that it was prohibited and smuggled.

His lawyers now claim that because of the actions of the local tax body, the businessman has suffered loss of delivery time of the cargo to its destination – China and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

They insist that the cargo was wrongfully seized while in transit to Mombasa, claiming the action contravenes the East African Customs Management law.

However, when the case came up for hearing on December 20 last year, Judge Musalu declined to hear the case and instead ordered that the Congolese businessman should appear in court January 10 (Friday).

In appearing in court, the judge had said, Kayumba would have to explain how and where he got the contentious ivory from, part of which Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) fears could have come from some of its reserves in Uganda.

But the Friday hearing flopped following the absence of trial Judge Musalu, who was said to be in Entebbe presiding over a criminal session.

Kayumba, who is the complainant in the matter, also did not appear in court.

According to Judge Musalu’s court clerk, the matter will be fixed for hearing on a yet-to-be decided date.

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Bamwine dismisses claims of mafia in judiciary
PRINCIPAL Judge Yorokamu Bamwine has dismissed as baseless allegations that there are mafias in the Judiciary. He has also denied that case court files disappear...
Court petitioned to disband interim Red Cross board
Ssebunya filed a civil suit at the High Court in Kampala against URCS seeking a pronouncement that the Interim board has no mandate to restructure the organisation...
Ugandans in Netherlands form an association
Ugandan community living in Netherlands has formed an assocaition and elected leaders. The election was held at Ganzenhoef in Amsterdam....
DP condemns railway evictions
THE Democratic Party has condemned the manner in which KCCA evicted the railway reserve settlers leaving them stranded...
Uganda slammed over high HIV rates
UNAIDS country coordinator in Uganda, Musa Bungudu has lashed at the country saying it isn’t doing enough in the fight against HIV...
Gang rape victim testifies in court
THE woman, who was testifying as the first prosecution witness, told court that the acts included one sitting on her head and inserting his sexual organ in her mouth, while others penetrated her through all remaining orifices...
Should private schools and institutions be given tax exemption?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter