MTN welcomes court decision on tax evasion case

Dec 25, 2012

MTN had approached the High Court to review the Chief Magistrate’s decision to issue summons for its directors and executives to take plea on tax evasion charges

By David Mugabe

TELECOM giant MTN Uganda has welcomed the decision by Judge Lameck N. Mukasa of the High Court of Uganda to throw out criminal summons against the firm’s senior management and board of directors.

Mukasa, according to a statement, set aside all orders previously issued by the chief magistrate of the Buganda Road Magistrate Court dated 10 October 2012, 6 November 2012 and 19 November 2012 aiming at issuing criminal summons against the senior management and board of directors of MTN Uganda despite the lack of prima facie evidence.

MTN had approached the High Court to review the Chief Magistrate’s decision to issue summons for its directors and executives to take plea on tax evasion charges, yet the Court had no record of formal charges or proceedings.

MTN Uganda chief executive officer Mazen Mroué said in a statement that the private prosecution initiated by former MTN employee Naphtali Were, had no merit. 

Mroué said MTN was forging ahead with its criminal prosecution and civil claim against Were and directors of Threeways for their active involvement in allegedly defrauding MTN Uganda.

“The judgement is a strong affirmation of MTN’s strong corporate values of ethical behaviour and integrity. We took the magistrate’s ruling for review by the High Court because we view any allegations of unethical conduct against MTN in a very serious light.

“Similarly, MTN has zero tolerance for fraud. For this reason, we will prosecute those who defraud MTN and propagate false information to the detriment of MTN Uganda and the MTN Group to the fullest extent of the law,” said Mroué.

MTN had earlier expressed grave concern about the magistrate’s conduct, in a formal complaint to the Judicial Service Commission.

MTN complained that the summons dated November 6 2012 were issued a day after the same Magistrate had transferred the case to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to investigate the allegations, yet the DPP had not applied for any criminal summons.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});