today's Pick
AG, NEMA want Nyakana's case dismissed
Publish Date: Sep 04, 2014
AG, NEMA want Nyakana's case dismissed
Kampala Central Mayor Godfrey Nyakana
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Edward Anyoli

 

THE Attorney General has asked the Supreme Court to throw out an appeal by Kampala Central Mayor Godfrey Nyakana against NEMA.

 

The Attorney General said NEMA demolished Nyakana’s house in 2004 because it was built in a wetland.

 

Senior State Attorneys George Kallemera and Christine Akello who represented the Attorney General in their written submission presented to court said NEMA took that decision because it was protecting the environment from destruction.

 

Nyakana appealed against the Constitutional Court decision where it ruled that NEMA was right to order the demolition of his residential house in Bulogobi.

 

Through his lawyer Mohammed Mbabazi, Nyakana is seeking court order to award him costs and damages for demolishing his house.

 

He also wants the Supreme Court to declare sections of National Environmental Management Act that provide for environmental restoration unconstitutional.

 

Both the Attorney General and NEMA opposed the orders sought by Nyakana and asked the court to maintain and uphold earlier decision of the Constitutional Court that dismissed Nyakana’s appeal.

 

Kallemara and Akello told Court presided over by a Coram of Judges Bert Katureebe, Benjamin Odoki, Galliano Okello, William Tsekooko, Esther Kisaakye, Stella Arach Amoko and Christine Kitumba that the sections in the National Environmental Management Act that provide for environmental restoration orders operate in the public interest and court should agree with the earlier decision of the Constitutional Court.

 

Constitutional Court on November 9, 2009 dismissed Nyakana’s appeal and agreed with Attorney General and NEMA, that it was right to order the demolition.

 

Nyakana being dissatisfied with Constitutional decision appealed to the Supreme Court saying the lower court erred when it acted without due diligence and illegally by destroying his  house.

 

Nyakana argued that the sections that give mandate to NEMA for environmental restoration are unconstitutional. Court will give its ruling on notice.

Related stories

Nyakana on the run after assaulting traffic officer

Nyakana defies NEMA over wetland

Nyakana in Luzira wetland row

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Apple Watch begins global launch - quietly
The Apple Watch makes its global debut on Friday in a launch aimed at making Apple the leader in wearable technology....
Candidate uses nude photos for election campaign posters
A naked nationalist is stirring up election billboards in Japan, offering a bit of colour - and a lot of flesh - to get out the vote....
And the happiest country in the world is . . .
A newly unveiled global ranking of happiness reveals the happiest country on the planet. Can you guess which one it is?...
Bottling the scent of the dead as perfume
A company has come up with a way to keep people close to their departed loved ones: bottling their scent as a perfume....
A major crackdown on strippers at funerals
Chinese authorities bare the details of their latest anti-vice sweep: a campaign to halt the hiring of strippers at funerals....
Police to carry out DNA test on
POLICE will carry out a DNA test on Apolonia Kobusinge to establish whether she is the same woman buried in 2004...
Do you support KCCA'S move to return city communter buses?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter