today's Pick
AG, NEMA want Nyakana's case dismissed
Publish Date: Sep 04, 2014
AG, NEMA want Nyakana's case dismissed
Kampala Central Mayor Godfrey Nyakana
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Edward Anyoli

 

THE Attorney General has asked the Supreme Court to throw out an appeal by Kampala Central Mayor Godfrey Nyakana against NEMA.

 

The Attorney General said NEMA demolished Nyakana’s house in 2004 because it was built in a wetland.

 

Senior State Attorneys George Kallemera and Christine Akello who represented the Attorney General in their written submission presented to court said NEMA took that decision because it was protecting the environment from destruction.

 

Nyakana appealed against the Constitutional Court decision where it ruled that NEMA was right to order the demolition of his residential house in Bulogobi.

 

Through his lawyer Mohammed Mbabazi, Nyakana is seeking court order to award him costs and damages for demolishing his house.

 

He also wants the Supreme Court to declare sections of National Environmental Management Act that provide for environmental restoration unconstitutional.

 

Both the Attorney General and NEMA opposed the orders sought by Nyakana and asked the court to maintain and uphold earlier decision of the Constitutional Court that dismissed Nyakana’s appeal.

 

Kallemara and Akello told Court presided over by a Coram of Judges Bert Katureebe, Benjamin Odoki, Galliano Okello, William Tsekooko, Esther Kisaakye, Stella Arach Amoko and Christine Kitumba that the sections in the National Environmental Management Act that provide for environmental restoration orders operate in the public interest and court should agree with the earlier decision of the Constitutional Court.

 

Constitutional Court on November 9, 2009 dismissed Nyakana’s appeal and agreed with Attorney General and NEMA, that it was right to order the demolition.

 

Nyakana being dissatisfied with Constitutional decision appealed to the Supreme Court saying the lower court erred when it acted without due diligence and illegally by destroying his  house.

 

Nyakana argued that the sections that give mandate to NEMA for environmental restoration are unconstitutional. Court will give its ruling on notice.

Related stories

Nyakana on the run after assaulting traffic officer

Nyakana defies NEMA over wetland

Nyakana in Luzira wetland row

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Kampala stripper protester charged with indecent assault
A woman who caused public uproar when she appeared to flash her privates at arresting police officers who were taking opposition figure Ingrid Turinawe into custody has been charged with inciting violence...
The Commercial Court has summoned Brig. Henry Tumukunde to defend himself on allegations of land grabbing....
S. Sudan gov
South Sudanese troops are back in full control of the strategic northern oil town of Malakal, the government claimed Monday....
Mother abandons her kids to join IS
A Sydney mother has abandoned her two children and fled to Syria for a new life under the Islamic State group....
Rwanda
Rwanda’s second largest political party, Parti Social Démocrate (PSD), has backed the removal of term limits for elected political leaders in the country’s constitution....
More than 430 dead in India heatwave
More than 430 people have died in two Indian states from a days-long heatwave....
Should graduated tax be revived?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter