Opinion
Equitable water, sanitation funding is key to ending diseases
Publish Date: Jul 14, 2014
newvision
  • mail
  • img

By Simon J. Mone

In November 2013, the Vision Group’s clean town competition resulted in the cleanest and dirtiest towns in Uganda. Findings therein revealed deplorable sanitation of our towns. Naturally, we were expected to respond to this feedback by improving our environmental sanitation.

Surprisingly, hardly a year on, no significant progress has been made, save for a few towns led by Kampala city which has shown great improvement. Cleanliness of countryside towns remains awful. Inhabitants struggle with raw sewage flowing through open channels, back streets are littered. Toilet use is improper and the bush is still being used quite a lot.

UN General Assembly Resolution 64/292 states that access to clean water and sanitation is a fundamental human right. Within our communities, vulnerable people are yet to feel the impact of this resolution. Universal target of achieving adequate supply of water and especially sanitation is far from being attained.

Collective efforts should be increased to provide sanitation access to the World’s less privileged population, which should be enjoying their ‘fundamental right’ to access.

The leading cause of disease and mortality in mostly developing countries has always been linked to the absence of safe water and the lack of good sanitation. Moreover, no one can doubt that continued absence of safe water and good sanitation does not only have a negative impact on health, it leads to food and nutrition problems.

Prioritising proper; garbage management, toilet use, foul water and sewage disposal is vital in improving well-being and health of communities.

Although improvements are being made in hygiene, especially hand washing in schools and human waste disposal, rising population and limited funding hinders impact of these initiatives.

Funding of hygiene-related initiatives is still seen to be much lower than funding of clean and safe water projects. If more funds are committed to sanitation programmes, hygiene practices will become more sustainable.

This is possible, if funding always aims at the best possible ways of integrating hygiene promotion into water supply and sanitation projects.

Development partners have for a long time committed bigger amounts of money towards drilling boreholes, protecting wells and springs, rainwater harvesting in rural areas but little or no money in providing toilets and solid waste disposal systems. The growing populace are constraining existing facilities, hence dysentery and cholera recurrence of the recent past.

We desire to live in clean environments so this is the time to adequately fund sanitation projects. Improvements in sanitation have always been complicated by high population growth and increased urbanisation.

Success in sanitation projects will be attainable, if the Government and development partners support communities in finding an appropriate balance between funding sanitation projects and funding water projects.

Let the funding be provided in equal measure because should clean water be supplied, waste water should expected. Communities in especially rural areas have got to be empowered to have access to potable water and improved sanitation.

Achieving the right balance between water and sanitation will effectively address the problem of diseases and hunger. If communities do not fall sick, they devote more time in doing productive activities. This helps in boosting incomes.

Conversely, when communities have no access to adequate and sustainable sanitation facilities, then most of the time, they will be in and out of hospitals treating sicknesses. They spend most of the time and money to get healthier. In the process they remain less productive.

The writer is a civil engineer
 

Related Stories

Government support is key to ending eeglected tropical diseases

Sh200b funds for mosquito nets

We have lost three children to a Mysterious disease

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Uganda’s forestry regulations are long overdue
According to Uganda’s National Forest Plan 2013, the forest cover has continued to deteriorate with an average annual deforestation rate of 1.8%....
The new cancer facility is a beacon of hope
On Thursday last week, the President flanked by the US officials and other dignitaries officially opened the UCI-Fred Hutchinson Cancer Centre in Mulago....
Uganda vs Malaysia
Malaysia, with its stronger economic and stabler political history, has been in a better position to implement strategic plans....
Does democracy lead to development?
Does democracy lead to development? Analysts overtime have reached a consensus....
Smart development targets
Over the next 15 years, the international community will spend $2.5 trillion on development, with national budgets contributing countless trillions more....
The return of the Balkan Question
“One must Europeanise the Balkans, in order to avoid the Balkanisation of Europe.”...
Should medical students be subjected to pre-admission exams?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter