Towns
Chinese investor brands lobby group economic saboteur
Publish Date: Jul 08, 2014
newvision
  • mail
  • img

By Andante Okanya

MUKONO - A Chinese investor sued by a lobby group Center for Health, Human Rights and Development (CEHURD), over purported pollution of a water stream in Mukono district has rubbished the lobby as an economic saboteur.

China Communication Construction Company’s rebuttal is contained in its statement of defense filed on June 20 at the civil division of the High Court in Kampala.

It is in response to a suit filed on June 19 by CEHURD, against the investor. CEHURD asserts that the suit was filed in public interest.

The other co-defendants are statutory environmental watchdog National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) and Mukono district local government.

But through Muhwezi Law Chambers and Advocates, the investor contends that the Mukono residents, whom the lobby group claims to represent, have a cordial understanding with the investor.

“The plaintiff is using/abusing court process to sabotage economic development and hide behind the veil of public interest litigation in a bid to avoid costs,” the defense states in part.

Adding: “The plaintiff does not have locus to institute this suit as it is representative in nature without leave of court and the permission of the known members of the community.”

The investor states that it has acquired the necessary legal certifications from NEMA and the district local government to do business.

According to court documents, the company began operations in the area in 2012. Its activities involve blasting of rocks and grading of land.

The petition is supported by the affidavits of the CEHURD programme manager in charge of strategic litigation, Noor Nakibuuka, plus the local council leaders of the two villages.

The lobby is seeking to stop stone quarrying activities in the Mukono villages of Bamutakudde and Kiryamuli, saying it has contaminated a water stream used by the two villages.

But the investor argues that it has made all necessary precautions to better the lives of the villagers by providing clean water from a tank.

It contends that an agreement was reached to build a wall to shield the well and stream from mud.

The investor further asserts that it has not carried out any activities that interfere with access and use of the stream that the two villages depend on as a source of water.

The case file has been allocated to Justice Benjamin Kabiito, with the case pending determination.


Also related to this story


NEMA, Chinese investor sued over Mukono pollution

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Groom disappears three days to wedding
A planned wedding in Lira flops when the bridegroom goes missing three days before the D-day....
Road spots to note during Christmas travel
We map out for you the main roads to highlight the spots you need to watch out for during your Christmas travel....
Ideal buys for a village Christmas
Christmas is upon us. Thinking about taking a trip to the village? What do you buy, what do you leave behind?...
EAC leaders meet over Northern Corridor projects
Regional Heads of State have met in Nairobi, Kenya to discuss Northern Corridor Integration projects....
Government to renovate remand homes
The Government has secured sh3b to renovate the remand homes in the country, the state minister for youth Ronald Kibuule has revealed....
Museveni asks Dubai Ports’ boss to invest here
President Museveni has invited the Chairman of Dubai Port World (DPW) Sultan Ahamed bin Sulayem to invest in Uganda....
Do you agree with the ban on the export of maids?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter