National
Court orders “Princess” to refund over sh100m to land buyer
Publish Date: Jul 01, 2014
Court orders “Princess” to refund over sh100m to land buyer
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Hillary Nsambu  

Nakawa High Court circuit sitting Justice Wilson Masalu Musene has ruled that Faridah Naluwembe Namirembe-Bwanga, referring to herself as “Princess”, must refund Sh175m to a city businessman Andrew Kawuki, saying that she sold him air instead of land.

 
Dismissing an application in which “princess” Naluwembe had sought to be permitted to defend herself against the suit by Kawuki for the recovery of the money against her, the judge also ordered her to pay interest at bank rate on the money plus the taxed costs of the suit amounting to over sh66m.
 
The judge agreed with Hassan Kamba, representing Kawuki, arguing that even if, as she claimed, that she sold the land under powers of attorney from Hajati Nassuuna Hanifa, which powers were never there, she was only authorized, according to the documents on record, to look for potential buyers, but not to sell.
 
Kamba had also argued that the land Namiremebe purported to sell on behalf of principal, Hajati Nassuuna Hanifa, did not even belong to either of them.
 
The court further agreed with Kamba that according to the Land registry, the land in question, which is comprised in Kibuga Block 18, Plot 153 situated at Nateete did not belong to either Naluwembe or Nassuuna, as the former (Naluwembe) claimed, but to Karoli Kizito, according to the Lands Registry.
 
The court further agreed with Kamba’s submission that Naluwembe very well knew that she was selling air, a transaction that was fraudulent. Neither “princess” Naluwembe nor Hajati Nassuuna was in Court.
 
The court rejected submission by Naluwembe’s lawyer Swabur Manzuq, who had said that as an agent of Nassuuna, she had issues to present to court. The judge ruled that it was not enough to say that there are issues without mentioning them.                          
 
The court ruled that it was noteworthy that the applicant Naluwembe conceded to part of the case and accepted to refund sh157m as part of the total amount and say that she would contest the other part of sh175m.         

RELATED ARTICLES   

 ‘Princess’ sued for conning businessman
 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Amuru district: 300 land disputes in one week
Over 300 land disputes have been recorded in the northern Uganda district of Amuru during a five-day free legal service week....
Judiciary introduces plea bargain sessions
The judiciary is in the process of introducing plea bargain practice directions in criminal justice mainly to decongest prisons....
EA media managers want reforms in journalism curriculum
Media managers in East Africa have asked journalism training institutions in the region to consider changing the curriculum from one which focuses on theories to a skill-based approach....
UPDF mourns Congolese general
The UPDF is mourning the death of their Congolese comrade, Maj. Gen. Ambamba Bahuma, who has been instrumental in fighting the Uganda rebel Allied Democratic Front (ADF) in North Kivu Province Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)...
New test fast-tracks diagnosis for malaria
A new invention can cheaply and accurately diagnose malaria infection in just a few minutes using only a droplet of blood....
Man arrested for blocking enumeration exercise
A peasant farmer is in police custody in Lira for allegedly interrupting the ongoing national population and housing census....
Do you think banning the sale of single cigarette sticks will help regulate tobacco production?
yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter