today's Pick
Finance rejects sh3000 tax on mobile phone lines
Publish Date: May 04, 2014
Finance rejects sh3000 tax on mobile phone lines
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Mary Karugaba

The Ministry of Finance has rejected a proposal by MPs to impose a user fee of sh3000 on every mobile phone line per year. The amount will also depend on the number of telephone lines one has.


The proposal by MPs on the Parliamentary Finance Committee is intended to streamline tax expenditure, tax policy and administration to raise tax efforts.

The proposal was forwarded to the Ministry of Finance for consideration, come next financial year.

“Most donors have indicated that they are pulling out of the budget support next financial year. So are trying to find possible means of raising our sources of revenues so that the population is not affected in terms of service delivery,” MP Lilly Adong argued.

Without proposing a figure, the MPs also called for a higher levy on night clubs.

But State Minister of Finance Fred Omach rejected the proposal arguing that there were already taxes on phones.

Omach argued that any additional tax would make the service less competitive and more costly.

“They are already a number of charges on mobile phones. The proposal to impose an additional user fee of sh3000 will make the service more costly and less competitive,” he said.

It’s becoming almost a tradition that every financial year, there’s a new tax introduced on mobile phones.

Currently, Ugandan mobile phone users pay a VAT of 18% and excise duty of 12 %. In addition, VAT is levied on handsets and exercise duty of $9 cents on international incoming calls.

The minister of Finance Maria Kiwanuka announced last month during a Caucus meeting at Entebbe that Uganda will be funding the coming year's budget largely from domestic revenue sources by 82 %.

This is in sharp contrast from last year when as much as 25 per-cent of the budget was donor funded. The aid cut follows donors’ concerns following theft of public funds.

Finance commissioner for Tax, Moses Kagwa told Newvision that although the ministry has looked at the proposal, it is not applicable. He doubted whether the MPs first did a research on the impact of the charge on consumers.

Adding that, “I think the proposal was not properly researched to ascertain its impact on consumers.”

Some mobile phone companies could not comment as their spokespersons were either out of the country or not available on weekends.

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
A 65-year-old German woman, who is already a mother of 13 children, has given birth to quadruplets after undergoing an artificial insemination procedure in Ukraine, RTL television reported early on Saturday....
S. Sudan president warns sanctions will worsen war
South Sudan President Salva Kiir has warned that proposed international sanctions will only worsen the civil war ravaging his country....
Big names linked to BUL FC coaching role
Big names in the local coaching industry have reportedly shown interest in steering Jinja-based BUL FC to the top of the Premier League....
Dogs
Man''s best friend may have been his companion for far longer than believed, according to latest scientific research....
Lukwago, Clarke not fit for Lord Mayor - Seya
Ssebagala scoffs at the two leaders for vying for the office of the Lord Mayor without potential to manage the office....
Gen Sejusa scoffs at opposition reforms
Sejusa scoffs at the opposition parties' and civil society organisations' efforts toward free and fair 2016 polls....
Should politicians be banned from addressing religious gatherings?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter