Opinion
Tackle root causes and not symptoms of FDC squabbles
Publish Date: Mar 14, 2014
newvision
  • mail
  • img

By Wataka Rogers

The recent political arguments and the bitterness spewn in the aftermath of the recent Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) appointments, the preceding squabbles between Gen. Mugisha Muntu and Nandala Mafabi raises some questions as well as sobering lessons.


Presently, the factions within the party are involved in some form of high stake “sports betting game” on the future of the party.

At stake is the future of the party, its legitimacy as a better alternative to the National Resistance Movement (NRM), which the opposition has, from time and again, accused of various excesses and lack of institutions.

Also hanging in balance, is the future of an entire country’s democratic institutional building in the context of opposition politics. There is a clear demonstration of cracks in the country’s largest opposition party occasioned by their incessant infighting and subtle greed.

Indeed, providing an accurate analysis of the individuals culpable in this divide, will involve looking beyond the self-righteous and self-serving statements made by the different factions in the FDC.

It is thus imperative to carefully reexamine the Gen. Muntu and Nandala Mafabi fallout and the complicity thereof of their claims in the light of their reactions in the not so distant past.

In the early wake of the fallout and eventual dropping of Nandala as Leader of Opposition.

Many potent defenses of the party in an attempt to salvage the situation were given in the various media forums, often overlooking the need to answer the critical questions like: Who will speak for the perceived pickets within the party? Can the party now work towards erecting an internal constitutional order that would preserve both the technical and moral necessity of strong systems? Can the different factions in the FDC, work towards reconciliation ratified in their constitution and the rule of law?

Important, to me, is the necessity to address the root causes other than the symptoms’.

In the aftermath of the FDC presidential election, Nandala cried foul play. Unfortunately, the act by which he publicly washed the party’s dirty linen in public became his undoing. His formerly serene, thoughtful sober and charismatic portrait was disfigured. It was instead, a very personal approach.

In the sweep of all these, Gen Mugisha Muntu appeared to be the more composed and serene figure, rightly, albeit occasionally extending an olive branch to Mafabi. Through shrewdness and the detachment from tawdry blame game from his opponent, he won the day.

Sadly, even the good old general now finds himself soaked from head to toe in the rain. I ask when it started raining on him.

My take is that his recent reshuffle bears the undercurrent of an orchestrated move to buy off the moderates while at the same time rewarding his supporters. The winner takes it all democracy, where the victor tramples the vanquished in an attempt to annihilate future competition.

This hard-line kind of politics that speaks and acts tough as the house divides will eventually be of detriment to the party. The baby was poured along with the birth water.

It will be practical and productive for the warring sides to shelve their interests and realise that the party’s survival is of more consequence than their individual ambitions. Unifying the party’s different factions is also a primary task for maintaining the party cohesion, democracy and rule of law.

This will have demonstrated to all and sundry, that action alone or words alone hardly count; no matter how right, they must be infused into laws and institutions.

The writer is from Uganda Christian University, Mbale Campus

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Electoral Reform: What unresolved question could mean
Come 2016, Uganda will go to the polls with yet again the question of an unresolved “legal map”. Whereas we may boast of having had a “road map” several years before the next election, the “legal map” for the 2016 election has again not been clearly defined especially to the people’s expectations...
Another Great Leap Forward for Development
Next month, the world will achieve a milestone for global development efforts. The United Nations General Assembly will adopt the Sustainable Development Goals, an ambitious set of global objectives expected to improve the lives of millions of people by 2030...
Europe’s nationalist night watch
Populism is on the rise throughout Europe, as both economically depressed and prosperous countries become increasingly frustrated with their established political elites. But populists are unlikely to take control of any European government in the foreseeable future, even where the risk currently s...
Militia groups! Hmmm
I watched on Television as Major Roland Kakooza Mutale passed out what he termed as crime preventers. However, his body language was quite suspect and I was left wondering these were actually crime preventers or potential crime creators...
The implication of the exchange rate depreciation for inflation and monetary policy
I would like to begin by commending the Private Sector Foundation for organising this Trade Expo, which performs an important role in promoting trade and industry in Uganda....
Why we should support women’s growth in politics
Women’s political participation is no longer an issue of contention as the Constitution gives every woman the right to vote, campaign for elective political office, attend village/ local council meetings and belong to a political party of their choice....
Are poor parliamentary debates a result of removal of school debates?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter