today's Pick
Activists lose petition on DDT use
Publish Date: Mar 12, 2014
Activists lose petition on DDT use
Justice Augustine Nshimye was on the panel of five judges
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Darius Magara and Andante Okanya

Activists opposed to the use of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), have lost a Constitutional petition that sought to ban the use of the chemical in the anti-malaria fight.

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal sitting as a Constitutional Court, on a technicality, that although the petition raised serious issues on environment protection, it did not raise matters for constitutional interpretation.

The petition arose in 2009, when civil society organisation Uganda Network on Toxic-Free Malaria Control (UNETMAC) dragged the Attorney General (AG), to court.

The organisation lamented that indoor residual spray and the continued use of the insecticide was calamitous to Uganda's agricultural exports.

Prior, the Health ministry had embarked on indoor residual spraying in homes in the northern districts of Apac and Oyam between April and May 2008.

The judgment of a panel of five Justices was delivered by Justice Kenneth Kakuru. The court declined to award government costs, noting that the petition was filed in public interest.

The other Justices on the panel were; Augustine Nshimye, Faith Mwondha, Eldad Mwangusya, and Geoffrey Kiryabwire.

They noted that they were unable to find anywhere that the petition calls for interpretation of the constitution. They pronounced that "the petition itself does not directly or by inference raise any issue or question that calls for constitutional interpretation."

UNETMAC lawyer Obed Mwebesa had argued that DDT use violated article 39 of the 1995 Constitution which prescribes that, "Every Ugandan has a right to a clean and healthy environment."

He asserted that the Health ministry did not adhere to guidelines set by the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA).

Mwambutysa said it was logical for the exercise to enable Government fulfill its constitutional duty of saving lives of its citizens.

After the judgment had been delivered, UNETMAC secretary general Ellady Muyambi, insisted that the organisation would lodge a fresh case in the High Court, as advised by the Justices.

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
All talk but no peace: South Sudan
After 13 months of fighting and six failed ceasefires, diplomats are being forced to accept that any deal to end the war in South Sudan will, at best, result in a return to the status quo that precipitated the carnage in the first place....
Humour at fallen writer Kalimugogo’s funeral
Laughter filled the air as mourners celebrated the life of renowned author and former career diplomat Godfrey Kalimugogo....
The newly appointed NRM executives have been directed not to contest for Parliamentary seats in the upcoming 2016 elections....
Old man murdered by own children over land
“Geoffrey, my child, why are you killing me? Are you killing me for my own property?” were the old man''s last words....
Japan launches new spy satellite
Japan on Sunday successfully launched a back-up spy satellite, its aerospace agency said, after cancelling an earlier lift-off due to bad weather....
Outrage as IS
The Islamic State group claimed in a video that it has beheaded a second Japanese hostage, drawing international condemnation....
Will a ban on Waragi sold in sachets reduce consumption of Alcohol?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter