National
Expelled MPs’ case: Supreme Court rules Thursday
Publish Date: Mar 04, 2014
Expelled MPs’ case: Supreme Court rules Thursday
Ejected MPs talk to Prof. Kanyeihamba in court. PHOTO/Francis Emorur
  • mail
  • img
newvision

By Hillary Nsambu

The Supreme Court will on Thursday rule whether the MPs expelled from the ruling party, NRM should retain their seats in Parliament pending the hearing and final disposal of their constitutional appeal.

 This followed an application for temporary orders restraining the Speaker of Parliament from ejecting them and the Electoral Commission from hold by-elections in their respective constituencies as the Constitutional Court had ordered.

On a 4-1 majority judgment, late last month, the Constitutional Court ordered the MPs to leave Parliament. It also ordered the Electoral Commission to organize by-election in their respective constituencies.

The four troubled MPs are Theodore Ssekikubo, Mohammed Nsereko, Barnabas Tinkasimire and Wilfred Niwagaba.  

Peter Mukidi Walubiri and Caleb Alaka, who submitted on behalf of a group of lawyers representing the four MPs, argued that the MPs like other citizens had a constitutional right of appeal, which has a high likelihood of success and as such they should not be condemned unheard.

The lawyers also submitted by asking the court to stop the Speaker of Parliament and the EC chairman from implementing the orders and directives of the Constitutional Court, the appellants were exercising their constitutional rights.

They said that they had also filed an application in court for a permanent injunction in which they seek for orders permanently restraining the Parliament and the EC from implementing the orders before the main appeal is heard. 

The opposing lawyers opposed the application, saying that what the applicants wanted to preserve had already been implemented and that there was no status quo to preserve. 

Earlier, Justice George Wilson Kanyeihamba, who used to lead the lawyers representing the expelled MPs expressed great disappointment for being removed from the group without being informed. He described the move by the appellants as a coup- de-etat . The court, however, remarked that he should not have discussed his misunderstandings with his lawyers in public.                

 

 

 

 

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
The 18-year-old Kibonge, the oldest lion at UWEC, Entebbe has died....
HIV injection nurse set free
Justice Rugadya Atwooki agrees with Rosemary Namubiru, a nurse who infected a baby with HIV, that her sentence was excessive and sets her free....
EALA Speaker Zziwa: I am doing well
The Speaker of the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA), Margaret Zziwa has described her suspension as illegal....
Over sh16b earmarked for research in non-communicable diseases
Global healthcare company, Glaxosmithkline(GSK) is calling out for proposals for scientific research in non-communicable diseases(NCDs) in Sub-Saharan Africa....
Kampala pork contaminated - study
Pork eaters in Kampala have reason to worry for their health following findings by a veterinary lecturer that 50% of pork consumed in the city is contaminated....
350 teaching jobs available for PhD holders in Ugandan universities
About 350 teaching positions calling for doctorate holders are yet to be filled in Ugandan Universities and other degree awarding institutions....
Should Govt lease parts of Lake Victoria to private developers?
Its Ok
No Way
Not Sure
follow us
subscribe to our news letter