Opinion
Over reliance on legal means slows war on corruption
Publish Date: Feb 13, 2014
newvision
  • mail
  • img

By Innocent  Ddamulira
 
By July 2013, the corruption rankings by transparency international a global coalition against corruption indicated that Uganda corruption index continued to soar.


By then, the global corruption barometer indicated that among the 95 countries surveyed, Uganda was listed among the 17 most corrupt in the world. With a score of 61%, Uganda became the most corrupt country in East Africa after Kenya at 70%. Rwanda turned out to be the least corrupt in the region.

 Transparence International insists that understanding corruption is key to fighting it and thus provides a working definition simply as “abuse of entrusted power for private gain”. Corruption is not a local issue, It is a global threat and all reports continue to emphasize that the abuse of power, secret dealings and bribery ravage societies around the world.

Numerous, close to infinity writers and analysts have looked at corruption in terms of its index and consequences. This discussion seeks to center on management of the vice, offer an analysis of the success of legalistic measures visa vie administrative techniques with a comparative approach, in light of Uganda’s peculiar circumstances.

It is disturbing but not surprising that a spectrum of civil society have released reports and some of them launched by government officials but we continue to see a catalogue of corruption scandals. Scholars have of course argued that the government doesn’t have the political will to fight corruption. While I do not wholly dismiss the reverse as a complete solution, I find difficulty in accepting that argument “mirror image” in the circumstances.

My view is informed by specific cases where the Government has shown its most available effort and goodwill while prosecuting cases of corruption but similar graft is repeated in the same offices or related organizations. While Teddy Seezi Cheeye may still be rotting in prison on a 28 year sentence for his role in Global fund, his counterparts in similar offices continue to swindle public funds. While Geofrey Kazinda serves his sentence for his guilt for the 29 counts of fraud committed at the popular office of the Prime Minister (OPM), his counterparts have not refrained from the same!

This trend indicates the peculiar circumstances in Uganda and suggests that the same measures may do less to fight the vice. We must emulate tactics of countries with pleasant corruption indexes. Currently, Denmark remains the most corrupt free country in the world followed by Newzealand and Finland according to the corruption perceptions index 2013. In the region Rwanda ranks high while Uganda remains on the bottom. The question here is whether it is not just logical to study the approaches employed by these countries and apply the same to Uganda’s circumstances.

Corruption experts have proposed a twofold approach; Administrative measures and a name and shame strategy. Proponents of this approach argue that while prosecution has great respect for the rule of law, corruption cases are extremely complex to prosecute and gain a conviction. This is largely because of the nature of evidence required to be adduced to cause a possible conviction. Often times the corrupt make it difficult to access any incriminating documents.

On the other hand, Administrative measures especially in Government bodies are swift means to curb the vice. I am not proposing to hang the corrupt approach like it is done in Singapore, I am simply proposing that we should fire the corrupt and make it difficult for them to access employment elsewhere. The practice of firing an officer in one organization and appointing the same officer in another in no time is counterproductive. Two days ego the head of Italian space resigned on a mere allegation of corruption but the peculiar nature of our people is that they never resign so they should be forced to resign. In addition name and shame those implicated and those alleged.

It is only a fool who uses the same approach and expects different results! If we have used legal means and have made no significant shift, it’s high time we employed new administrative and strenuous measures to fight the vice.

 

 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Tibet after the Dalai Lama
On the 80th birthday of the 14th Dalai Lama, exiled in India since 1959, Tibet’s future looks more uncertain than ever....
Justice should not only be done but always be seen to be done
Corruption still remains the number one cancer in Uganda, looking at the Corruption Perception Index....
How graves contaminate ground water
From which source is your drinking water? Well, if you live off urban zones, chances are high you drink from under-earth....
Museveni
President Museveni’s commitment to adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) could earn him another term....
This Interns’ Mess and its Implications for Policy Makers
For any hospital intern, the word “mess” always evokes positive sentiments. It was the place where one had their meals, where one went to relax after a long shift and where one went to share with colleagues on complicated cases. Yet it is not in this cheerful sense that I would know....
Land as a precious resource given by God to man
Stretching back to Biblical and Holly Quran teachings, emphasis on equity, love and justice are clearly mentioned and emphasised....
Do you think Ugandan graduates are the worst in the region?
Yes
No
Can't Say
follow us
subscribe to our news letter