Opinion
Re-evaluate strategies to reduce maternal mortalityPublish Date: Feb 02, 2013
newvision
  • mail
  • img

“Tarehe Sita” celebrations which are held in remembrance of the first armed attack launched by the National Resistance Army guerrillas on February 6, 1981 usually involve various activities.  
 
These include cleaning of hospitals and health centres, schools, wells and community outreach programmes in which people receive free medication, health services and mosquito nets. Thank God, gone are the days when the sight of a soldier in combat sent shivers down one’s spine.  
 
Involvement in the promotion of better health is central to development; my focus is on women’s health. This week, a piece of news worth celebrating was the construction of a sh180m health facility by the Child Fund Uganda in Mayuge district to reduce the number of maternal deaths. Women were advised to use the facility rather than visit traditional birth attendants.
 
It was noted that mothers in that area have been going to Iganga Hospital which is 20km away to give birth and many have been dying. 
 
Related to this, I remembered a story told by one Member of Parliament, who is also a medical doctor, on how his mother gave birth to him in a banana plantation.  When I heard the story, I shuddered. I then realised that this story may not have been strange a few decades ago but it should not be the case today.  In fact, several children were named after such events; some are known as Kanyarutokye meaning “of a banana plantation”.  
 
Many questions come to my mind –how did the mother and baby survive in such unhygienic conditions? What if the birth had been complicated?
 
This situation was highly risky! It is reported that every minute, one woman dies somewhere in the world due to preventable complications in pregnancy or chilbirth. That is a total of 1,000 women dying every day, or 365,000 a year from pregnancy-related causes. 
 
Despite research that shows an overall decrease in worldwide maternal mortality since 1980, millions of women and girls still face a staggering risk of death or disability during pregnancy and childbirth. In sub-Saharan Africa, where Uganda is located, women have a one in 16 chance of dying during pregnancy or childbirth. 
 
The World Health Organization, defines maternal death as the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes”.
 
Other definitions include accidental and incidental causes and extend the time period of observation to one year after the end of the gestation.
 
According to research, major causes of maternal deaths are: severe bleeding (25%), infections (13%), unsafe abortions (13%), eclampsia (12%), obstructed labour (8%), other direct causes (8%), and indirect causes (20%). 
 
Indirect causes are malaria, anaemia, HIV/AIDS, and cardiovascular disease, all of which complicate pregnancy or are aggravated by it. In some cases, high rates of maternal deaths occur in the same countries that have high rates of infant mortality, reflecting generally poor nutrition and medical care.
 
Another issue that is associated with maternal mortality is the lack of access to skilled medical care during childbirth and the distance of traveling to the nearest clinic to receive proper care. 
 
In developing countries and rural areas traveling to and back from the clinic is very difficult and costly, especially to poor families when time could have been used for working and providing incomes. Even so, the nearest clinic may not provide decent care because of lack of qualified staff and equipment. 
 
Most maternal deaths are avoidable, as the health-care solutions to prevent or manage complications are well known. All women need is access to antenatal care in pregnancy, skilled care during childbirth, and care and support in the weeks after childbirth.
 
It is particularly important that all births are attended by skilled health professionals, as timely management and treatment can make the difference between life and death.
To improve maternal health, barriers that limit access to quality maternal health services must be identified and addressed at all levels of the health system.  Researchers conclude that improving maternal health depends on key factors, which include: 
 
lreviewing all maternal health-related policies frequently to ensure that they are internally coherent; 
lenforcing standards on providers of maternal health services; 
 
llocal solutions to problems discovered should be promoted, not discouraged; 
 
lenforcement of the right to health which includes entitlements to goods and services, including sexual and reproductive health care and information;  
 
laction to break down political, economic, social and cultural barriers that women face in accessing the interventions that can prevent maternal mortality; 
 
lparticipation by stakeholders in policy and service development; and
lprovision of adequate funding and accountability for maternal mortality.  
 
The key word is vision. In signing up for MDG-5, countries have indicated their vision. But it is meaningless unless it is translated into a clear strategy for achieving it. If maternal mortality is the agreed priority, then what are we waiting for?
 
A recent directive by the President to fully equip Health Centre IIIs to handle all health complications including maternal health services should be given priority.  
 
Creation of awareness on maternal health, equipped health Centre IIIs staffed with well-facilitated skilled personnel will no doubt reduce maternal mortality drastically. No woman should die while giving life.  
 
This years’ Tarehe Sita theme –”Lessons from our history:  NRM’s commitment to create a better future for Uganda” is fitting.  Let us launch an armed attack against maternal mortality TODAY.
 
 
 

The statements, comments, or opinions expressed through the use of New Vision Online are those of their respective authors, who are solely responsible for them, and do not necessarily represent the views held by the staff and management of New Vision Online.

New Vision Online reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author.Find out why we moderate comments. For any questions please contact digital@newvision.co.ug

  • mail
  • img
blog comments powered by Disqus
Also In This Section
Should a ruling political party have power to sack the president?
When the NRM expelled some of its MPs from the party, I didn’t expect the kind of controversy that has arisen as to whether they should or shouldn’t vacate their seats....
Africa must guarantee her own security
By the end of this year, OAU/AU will be celebrating its Golden Jubilee whose theme is 50 yrs of Pan Africanism and Renaissance. Truly, Africa is proud to celebrate her fundamental gains....
Liberalization of the pension sector is the way to go
French Philosopher Jean Jacque Rousseau has been widely quoted as having often said that “man is born free and everywhere he is in chains...
Promotion of small power plants over big power plants better for Uganda
On May 21, 2013, the new vision news paper carried a story entitled “focus shifts to small power plants as fate of Karuma remains uncertain”....
The government’s stand on four children per household is a step in the right direction
Sometime back, the media was awash with news of the current stand of the Government on family planning....
Sh32b Graduate Fund will transform Uganda forever!
Facts and figures speak louder than words and arguments! This is how I cooled down tempers among pessimist peers at my workplace, as hot arguments criss-crossed offices over the latest version of the Youth Fund: Sh32b for graduates to start business....
Serbian Milutin 'Micho' Sredojevic is Uganda Cranes' new coach
He will lead Cranes to World Cup 2014
He will lead Cranes to AFCON 2015
He can only win a CECAFA title
follow us
subscribe to our news letter