Yes, HIV Vaccine is possible and this is why

May 18, 2016

Almost two decades later advocates and researchers will once again mark the day with advocacy messages and updates on the field on what has come to be called HIV Vaccine Awareness Day.


By Hilary Bainemigisha

Today, May 18, 1997, the then US President, Bill Clinton, in a commencement speech at Morgan State University called for a "new national goal for science" to develop a vaccine for HIV within a decade.

Almost two decades later advocates and researchers will once again mark the day with advocacy messages and updates on the field on what has come to be called HIV Vaccine Awareness Day. As advocates, we mark the date each year because of the hope research continues to give us for a possibility to end HIV in the world: there are multiple discoveries and new insight about the virus that makes the prospect for a HIV vaccine more feasible with each passing year.

Two years after Clinton's call for a focus on vaccine research, the South African government made a significant investment in HIV vaccine research, the first major commitment from an African country.

Today, the HIV vaccine research programs and clinical research in Thailand, Kenya, Nigeria and several other countries are working on dozens of approaches to find a safe and effective HIV vaccine.

For 2016, marking May 18 is more important than ever as we celebrate the many new findings that built on the success of RV144, also know as the Thai trial. In 2009, RV144 showed modest efficacy - enough to prove that an AIDS vaccine is possible and to offer clues to how researchers might develop a more effective, licensable vaccine that could have a major impact on the epidemic. Seven years after that glimmer of efficacy, a decision is expected in the coming months about whether or not a modified version of that vaccine will move to a large scale efficacy trial in South Africa.

If this new trial goes forward this year, over 5,000 South African men and women will be asked to join tens of thousands of others around the world who have rolled up their sleeves for experimental jabs in the hope of finding a vaccine to help end the worst epidemic in human history. That's news worth celebrating this year.

We're also excited about another study of a vaccine product, developed by US pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson. This vaccine may also move to the field for testing in the coming year or so, if data from earlier stage trials continues to look promising. That means when we are celebrating next HIV Vaccine Awareness Day, there could be thousands more women and men in dozens of communities working hand in hand with researchers to find an effective vaccine.

We know there's a chance that these vaccine strategies won't be deemed good enough to give the answers of effectiveness we are looking for. And we know that even if one or both does, there's a chance they won't be effective in large trials or be licensed for use in public health settings.

While we wait to see if these two efficacy trials move forward, researchers have already begun a different kind of efficacy study in North and South America, with a companion study slated to begin soon in East and Southern Africa. The antibody-mediated prevention (AMP, for short) will look at whether or not an infusion of a broadly neutralizing antibody, known as a bNAb, delivered every eight weeks can prevent HIV infection. Researchers have discovered hundreds of different bNAbs over the past few years in the blood of HIV-infected people, who produce them naturally. In laboratory studies, these antibodies effectively block many different strains of HIV from infecting human cells. With the AMP studies, researchers have redesigned the bNAbs to see if they can block HIV infection.

The result of the AMP studies won't be a new prevention option, but instead answers to some of the key questions that researchers have about how to construct an HIV vaccine that could train the human immune system to develop these antibodies on its own. It's a different concept for an efficacy trial than we are used to, but these are important and exciting studies in search for new HIV prevention options.

The one question we get more than any other is "when will there be an HIV vaccine?" If science missed President Clinton's deadline, how many more years or decades must we wait? The plain truth is we don't know. Even if one of these promising strategies is eventually proven effective, positive results are just the beginning of making a vaccine available to those who need it. Moving from results to licensure, wide-scale manufacturing and rollout plans can add several years to the process. So we know that we will continue to mark this day and measure the progress toward a safe, effective, licensed and available HIV vaccine for many years to come.

With each HIV Vaccine Awareness Day, we balance optimism with a reminder that the path we are on is long and winding. This year, in particular, we mark the day with hope, optimism, and a renewed sense of purpose to work alongside researchers, funders and policy makers along with trial participants and their communities to ensure that we are moving along the path with focus, determination and relative speed.

We echo the words of South African Minister of Science and Technology Naledi Pandor at the inaugural Research for Prevention Conference in Cape Town in 2014: "We remain many years away from eliminating HIV as the epidemic continues to outpace our efforts to control it. The number of newly infected people each year continues to outnumber those who gain access to treatment. We need new prevention tools if we are to escape this epidemic. Investment in research and development for new prevention tools remains a critical goal for us all."

And finally, we celebrate and acknowledge the role played by all those women and men supported by their communities, who join forces and participate in HIV vaccine trials. They show us it is only through a collaborative process of communities, scientists and governments that we shall be able to find an HIV vaccine.

The article was co-written by the members of the Vaccine Advocacy Resource Group

 

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});